Pro-Quest Article “Women Are Not Harmed by Societal Standards of Beauty.”
What feminism can’t do much about is society’s general appreciation of beautiful women. Nor should it. Aesthetics and autonomy can happily coexist. Insisting that cosmetics and fashion are tools of the patriarchy leaves women with two options: they can either refrain from all traditionally feminine pursuits, and thereby make themselves beauty martyrs; or they can engage in them, and thereby be left with the view that they are victims of male oppression. Yet a woman can reconstruct her face, take two aerobics classes a day, and wear corsets, bustiers, and fishnet stockings, and still be a feminist.
Feminist theorists are hardly the first, of course, to denounce beauty in the name of a higher good. The Puritans believed that ornament and sensuality distracted women (and men) from their spiritual duties. A drab proletarian chic was practically an article of faith among the fellow-traveling set during communism’s heyday and was picked up again, with variations, by privileged revolutionary students of the sixties.
“Women Are Not Harmed by Societal Standards of Beauty.”Opposing Viewpoints: Feminism. Jennifer A. Hurley. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2001. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Ventura College (CCL). 3 Nov. 2009


